Retracted vaping study shows the real danger of misinformation in nicotine debate

STOCKHOLM – A scientific paper claiming to link vaping with cancer has been formally retracted by the Journal of Cancer Policy after editors found serious flaws that undermined its conclusions.

The journal withdrew the review after identifying major problems with the study’s design, including inconsistencies in the evidence base, misclassification of research and conclusions that were not supported by the data.

Smoke Free Sweden says the episode highlights a growing problem in the global tobacco debate: the rapid spread of unreliable claims about safer nicotine alternatives.

“This case is a stark reminder that misinformation can travel far faster than scientific corrections,” said Dr Delon Human, leader of Smoke Free Sweden. “When flawed research enters the public debate it can distort policy discussions and mislead smokers who are looking for better options.”

Dr Human warned that inaccurate claims about reduced-risk products risk undermining efforts to move smokers away from combustible cigarettes, which remain the leading cause of tobacco-related disease.

“Millions of smokers need clear, accurate information about the relative risks of nicotine products,” he said. “Poorly conducted research can delay harm-reduction strategies that save lives.”

The retraction comes after a group of 23 leading European scientists publicly challenged “false and misleading” claims made by EU Health Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi about smoke-free nicotine products.

In an open letter addressed to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the experts warn that statements by Olivér Várhelyi claiming that smoke-free nicotine products are “as harmful” as cigarettes contradict the scientific evidence and risk distorting major European public health policies.

“Science should be used to guide health policy, so the accuracy of that science is not optional,” Dr Human added. “Getting the evidence right and then following that evidence is essential if we want to reduce smoking and prevent cancer.”

-ends-